Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aptech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @264 · 05:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aptech

Advert created by someone affiliated with the company where notability doesn't seem to have been establish satisfactorily. Nja²⁴⁷ 15:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep This is an international publicly traded company that far exceeds WP notability standards. Here are a few of hundreds of mentions in recent articles, in Economic Times,[1], Bloomberg,[2], Business Line,[3], Times of India.[4] I like this sentence from the Times of India article, which puts Aptech before some boutique mom-and-pop firms that you may have heard of: "Top executives from 22 leading IT companies, including Aptech, Cisco, Cognizant, Exl Services, Infosys, Microsoft India and Nucleus Software, participated in the survey." Priyanath ^talk 17:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm surprised that this is even coming to AfD. The company has received ultra-wide coverage per gnews, is traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange of India, market cap of Rs6600Mn. Despamming should be addressed through tags or just plain old chopping off of junk. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 17:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.